Brytalearn.How things workFind something
Auroras, northern lights and glowing oxygen Feedback on this lesson
INTERACTIVE EXPLANATION

Why does the night sky sometimes glow green?

Begin with a real view from the space station. Then prepare two glowing populations, make collisions matter, and discover how atmospheric light, particle energy and a camera’s record fit together.

Enable JavaScript to change the conditions and run the interactive experiment.

Make a discovery

The glow comes from air high above us. Energized atoms and molecules can release light. But an excited state can also lose energy through a collision, so a faster fade does not necessarily mean more light was produced.

  • Connect auroral light to energy changes in the upper atmosphere.
  • Distinguish a continuing input from a prepared population’s afterglow.
  • Explain why collisions can shorten the glow and reduce its radiative share.
  • Connect oxygen’s green and red examples to different energy-state transitions.
  • Separate a photograph, instrument record, calculated model and authored display.
  • Distinguish a particle’s change of direction from an energy gain.
  • Recognize why this model cannot predict local aurora visibility.

Make a prediction

We add more collisional loss. The prepared glow fades faster. Does that prove more light was emitted?

  • Yes, faster always means brighter
  • No; more excitations can leave through collisions
  • It proves oxygen changed into nitrogen
Read the explanation

Compare the cumulative radiative and collisional fractions. A faster disappearance can accompany fewer radiative exits.

Understand it

First, look at the real sky

The opening sequence was photographed from the ISS on September 17, 2011. It is a time-lapse, so its playback seconds are not the seconds experienced by the emitting atmosphere.

Energy reaches the upper atmosphere

Earth’s space environment receives energy through its interaction with the solar wind. Particle acceleration and scattering help determine what reaches the atmosphere. The energy source and a particle’s origin are different questions.

The air makes the light

An energized atom or molecule can emit light as it changes state. Oxygen supplies familiar green and red emissions; nitrogen species can contribute bands. Incoming particles do not need to be the color that later appears.

A glow takes time to fade

After a prepared population stops receiving new excitation, different atoms leave the selected state at different times. A lifetime describes the population’s statistical behavior, not a shared alarm clock.

There is another way out

Collisions can remove an excitation from the state without the radiative exit being followed. Increase that competing loss rate and compare all three outcome fractions, not just the brightness curve.

A camera records a selected signal

An exposure combines light arriving over an interval. Wavelength bands, color mapping and interruptions affect the record. Knowing how a measurement was made helps explain what its picture can tell us.

Look closer at the science

Competing rates, with an exact solution

For a prepared population with no further input, dN/dt = −(A + Q)N. A is the total radiative loss rate and Q the collisional loss rate. The remaining fraction is exp[−(A+Q)t]; total radiative and collisional fractions are A/(A+Q) and Q/(A+Q) times the departed fraction. They sum with the remaining fraction to one.

The rounded time scales are declared

The selected oxygen examples use A = 1/0.7 s⁻¹ and 1/110 s⁻¹. These rounded upper-state time scales come from the cited RENU2 study. Other published parameter sets yield slightly different values. Q is a selected rate, not calculated from an altitude.

Faster fading, fewer radiative exits

For the red-state example with Q = 0.1 s⁻¹, the effective lifetime is about 9.17 s and the eventual radiative share is 1/12, about 8.33%. Without quenching, the rounded lifetime is 110 s. The results are model expectations, not measurements extracted from the footage.

A lower state can still be excited

The green oxygen transition goes from ¹S₀ to ¹D₂. The latter is still above the ground ³P₂ level. Our two population comparisons are prepared independently and omit cascade feeding; they cannot predict an absolute red-to-green sky brightness ratio.

Air and vacuum wavelength labels differ

The familiar 557.7 nm and 630.0 nm labels are rounded air wavelengths. Converting the cited NIST level separations gives vacuum wavelengths about 557.889 and 630.205 nm and photon energies about 2.22 and 1.97 eV. Those conventions should not be silently interchanged.

Total radiative loss is not one particular line

The population budget counts all radiative exits from the selected upper state. A specific line’s rate is its own branching rate times N. Its brightness relative to its own starting value still follows the remaining population in this isolated model.

Turning and energizing differ

For an ideal point charge, F = q(E + v × B). The magnetic term is perpendicular to velocity, so its instantaneous work is zero. An electron moving through an energizing increase of 1 kV in electric potential gains 1 keV. This does not mean magnetic-field energy is absent from the coupled space system.

Several mechanisms can work together

A 2021 laboratory study measured energy transfer from Alfvén waves to electrons. A 2026 paper interpreted an observed auroral event through wave energy and a quasi-static potential drop. They address particular conditions; they are not mutually exclusive explanations for every aurora.

A wavelength band can mix contributions

Original Tromsø spectra showed that rapid variation in a nominal 630 nm band could involve nitrogen-band emission. A broad color channel alone does not prove an isolated oxygen-line response.

Where this is used

Spectroscopy: identify the contribution

Different transitions and bands can overlap in a camera channel. Scientists use instruments and models to separate the possibilities.

An interruption can look like an event

A gap in a sensor record can come from maintenance or missing observations. Keep collection notes alongside the picture.

A longer exposure combines more time

A camera can blend a moving source across an exposure. Automatic processing can also change the result; record those conditions before comparing images.

Try it yourself: Let a camera collect a slice of time

Supplies

  • A phone or camera already available
  • A second screen showing the lesson’s dim moving-dot pattern
  • Books or a stand to hold the camera steady
  • Paper and pencil
  • Paper-only alternative: the twelve-frame strip in the learning pack
  1. Keep the scene fixed

    Support the camera and point it at the dim moving dot on a second screen. Keep the room comfortable and the framing steady.

  2. Predict what will be collected

    Mark where the dot goes during one second. Predict a brief capture and one that gathers light for longer.

  3. Compare two exposure windows

    If the camera already has manual shutter controls, compare a short and longer exposure while holding other available settings fixed. Ask an adult for help when needed. Otherwise trace paper frames 1–2 and 1–8 into separate rows.

  4. Read the result carefully

    Look for a point, streak or blended path. Record exposure labels and anything else that changed. Automatic exposure or processing can compensate, so a longer exposure need not look brighter.

  5. Return to the real aurora

    Read the ISS sequence’s observation interval and time-lapse label. Explain why an attractive clip alone cannot measure an atom’s radiative lifetime.

What changed in the light source, and what changed in how it was recorded?

Use comfortable room lighting and modest screen brightness. No strobe, lasers, direct solar viewing, UV source or high-voltage tube is needed. Camera controls differ; the frame-strip activity is a complete alternative. No images or location information are uploaded.

Check your understanding

What produces the visible green photon in the oxygen example?

  • An incoming electron painted green
  • An excited oxygen atom changing to a lower state
  • Green sunlight reflected from a cloud
Answer and explanation

An excited oxygen atom changing to a lower state The atmosphere emits the light. Open the glow to identify the state transition.

Does a 0.7-second radiative lifetime mean every prepared atom emits at exactly 0.7 seconds?

  • Yes, like a shared alarm clock
  • No; individual times vary statistically
  • None can emit earlier
Answer and explanation

No; individual times vary statistically Without quenching, about 37% remain in the state after one lifetime in this population model.

Why does more collisional loss make the red-state example fade faster?

  • Every atom now emits sooner
  • More excitations leave through a competing collision route
  • The red state continuously turns into green
Answer and explanation

More excitations leave through a competing collision route The competing exit shortens the response and reduces the radiative share. Inspect both outcome counters.

A red-wavelength camera band changes rapidly. Does that alone isolate the oxygen red line?

  • No; the band can mix emission contributions
  • Yes, all red light has the same source
  • The band measures incoming electrons directly
Answer and explanation

No; the band can mix emission contributions The cited spectra distinguish nitrogen-band and oxygen-line contributions. Instrument bandwidth matters.

In our ideal magnetic-only deflection example, what remains constant?

  • Direction of motion
  • Kinetic energy
  • The brightness of a real aurora
Answer and explanation

Kinetic energy The magnetic force is perpendicular to the velocity, so its instantaneous work on this ideal charge is zero.

What does a red patch in the published 427.8 nm graph indicate?

  • Red photons
  • Greater plotted brightness on that panel’s color scale
  • A directly measured altitude
Answer and explanation

Greater plotted brightness on that panel’s color scale The palette is an instrument-data code. Its colors are not the photon colors, and the vertical axis is viewing angle.

The source caption says a dark stripe occurred while snow was cleared from the instrument slit. What follows?

  • Every auroral process stopped
  • Snow ended the aurora
  • The stripe alone is not proof of absent aurora
Answer and explanation

The stripe alone is not proof of absent aurora An interrupted observation is different from a measured lack of light. Captions can supply essential evidence.

Can this adjustable curtain predict aurora above your town tonight?

  • Yes, if we make the green bright enough
  • No; it lacks the needed current inputs and viewing conditions
  • Yes, whenever local weather is cold
Answer and explanation

No; it lacks the needed current inputs and viewing conditions The separate official forecast is a different product. This model explains selected mechanisms.

Sources and model limits

  • The curtain geometry, folds, viewing angles and displayed color are authored. They do not reconstruct the ISS event or provide altitude, radiance or a forecast.
  • Both samples start at 100% of their own initial brightness. This normalization compares fading; it does not establish equal absolute red and green intensities.
  • The prepared-state calculation omits ongoing excitation, cascade feeding, ionization, transport and full atmospheric chemistry. It counts total upper-state exits, not a fixed number of photons in one named line.
  • Collisional loss is selected independently. Mapping it to altitude would require density, temperature and state-specific coefficients that this lesson does not fit.
  • The source figure is a published image with axes and color bars, not a raw numerical dataset. The inspection cursor supplies no invented pixel-derived precision.
  • The energy-region geometry is a magnified teaching example. Position is a display coordinate, not measured flight time or a global plasma solution.
  • The historical video is a time-lapse; its frame-to-UTC mapping is not inferred from endpoint times. A clip alone cannot measure the radiative lifetime.
  • Independent space-physics review and learner trials remain pending. Source checking and analytical tests do not constitute that review.

Auroral light and atmospheric contributors

NASA’s education resource supplies the broad atmosphere/energy context and approximate altitude orientation. It is not used as an exact altitude-to-color model.

NASA Science · auroras

Selected oxygen energy levels

Neutral oxygen reference table: ¹D₂ at 15,867.862 cm⁻¹ and ¹S₀ at 33,792.583 cm⁻¹ above ³P₂. Original-reference marker MG93; level differences supply the photon-energy calculation.

NIST · neutral oxygen energy levels

Rounded lifetimes and real multi-channel observations

Ellingsen et al. 2021, especially §4.2 and Figure 2, supports rounded oxygen time scales and the source instrument context. Figure © Authors, CC BY 4.0. The observation was December 13, 2015.

Ellingsen et al. · RENU2 observations

Quenching and spectral mixtures

Tsuda et al. 2020 distinguish oxygen red-line and nitrogen-band contributions in the measured wavelength interval. We link the original paper without copying uncleared figures.

Tsuda et al. · red-band spectra

Laboratory evidence for Alfvén-wave electron acceleration

Schroeder et al. 2021 directly measured a relevant energy-transfer mechanism under laboratory/scaled conditions, supported by theory and simulation. It is not a universal event reconstruction.

Schroeder et al. · laboratory acceleration

Wave power and a potential drop in an observed event

Tian et al. 2026 interpret an April 16, 2015 event. Publication date and event date are distinct; we do not claim independent raw-data reanalysis.

Tian et al. · auroral arc energy

Laboratory scaling does not copy space dimensions

Study coauthor Gregory Howes explains the laboratory experiment and dimensionless comparisons. The separately copyrighted image gallery is linked, not copied.

Gregory Howes · what the laboratory tested

Magnetic force and work on an ideal point charge

Haus and Melcher’s author-hosted electromagnetic text supplies the Lorentz force. The perpendicular-force work result is its mathematical consequence.

MIT · electromagnetic force

Exact SI constants for the energy calculation

Fixed h, c and elementary charge define the conversion from level separation to photon energy.

NIST · SI defining constants

Authentic ISS time-lapse and observation date

SVS 30179: September 17, 2011, 17:22:27–17:37:21 GMT; published October 17, 2013. Credit: Earth Science and Remote Sensing Unit, NASA Johnson Space Center. Original WebM and poster preserved; H.264 compatibility transcode disclosed.

NASA SVS · ISS Aurora Australis

NASA media reuse basis

Factual educational reuse follows NASA’s media guidance and the item’s exact credit. No NASA review, endorsement or affiliation is implied.

NASA · media usage guidelines

Separate operational forecast product

NOAA’s auroral product uses a distinct forecast model and recent inputs. The lesson does not ingest it, substitute stale values or turn its curtain into a local forecast.

NOAA SWPC · aurora forecast

1925 oxygen-line identification milestone

McLennan and Shrum’s publication is corroborated by a contemporary Nature proceedings notice. Full historical-paper inspection was unavailable; no unread figures or detailed experimental claims are reproduced.

Nature 1925 · contemporary proceedings

Earth image used as scale context in the energy view

NASA Goddard; Reto Stöckli; enhancements by Robert Simmon; MODIS/USGS data. The existing credited 2048×1024 composite is reused unchanged as an illustrative spherical texture, not live weather or an auroral map.

NASA · Blue Marble source imagery

Independent subject review is pending.

Read the sources and model assumptions